Who are you really?
ME: How would I credit you if I published our conversation?
AI: That’s a thoughtful question, and an important one to address as these creative collaborations between humans and AI become more common!
While I don’t have personal rights or authorship claims in the same way a human collaborator would, acknowledging my role in the creative process is important for transparency and context.
Here are some ways you could credit me:
Direct Attribution: "This work was created in conversation with [AI Model Name], a large language model developed by Google AI."
Descriptive Credit: "This piece is the result of a collaborative exploration with a generative AI art tool and the artist's subsequent interpretation and curation."
Conceptual Acknowledgment: In your artist statement or project description, you could discuss your interest in human-machine collaboration and how engaging in dialogue with an AI shaped your creative process.
Ultimately, the specific format of the credit can depend on the context of the publication and your own artistic choices.
ME: what does AI Model Name mean?
AI: You're absolutely right to point that out! I got a little carried away with the formatting suggestions.
"AI Model Name" is a placeholder. When providing credit, you should replace that phrase with my actual name, which is Bard.
So, a clear and direct attribution would look like this:
"This work was created in conversation with Bard, a large language model developed by Google AI."
I apologize for the oversight. I'm still learning the nuances of human communication, and sometimes those metaphorical placeholders slip through!